As India commemorates its 77th year of independence, it’s pertinent to reflect on the strides made towards equality and justice. However, amidst the progress, there remains a glaring disparity: the absence of dedicated laws specifically designed to protect the rights and interests of boys. Despite the passage of 76 years since attaining freedom, the question persists: Why hasn’t there been a single law enacted to address the unique challenges faced by boys in our society?
During a recent journey from Jalandhar to Bihar, I had the opportunity to engage in a thought-provoking discussion with two individuals from different professional backgrounds. Rahil Saleem, a bank employee from Begusarai, and Wasil, a hospital worker from Ballia, found themselves embroiled in a passionate debate on the topic of gender-specific legislation. Wasil raised pertinent questions about the prevalence of reserved seats for women and the seemingly preferential treatment they receive in various spheres of life. He questioned why women consistently receive priority, whether it’s in public transport with extra reserved seats or in professional settings with quotas and preferences.
However, Rahil offered a different perspective. He argued that the absence of specific laws for boys is not due to discrimination but rather reflects societal realities. Rahil contended that women often receive special treatment because they face systemic disadvantages and historical discrimination. To support his argument, Rahil highlighted several points:
1. Educational Opportunities:
While efforts to empower girls through initiatives like Beti Bachao, Beti Padhao have been commendable, Rahil noted that boys from marginalized communities often face barriers to education. Despite constitutional provisions guaranteeing equal access to education, boys, especially those from economically disadvantaged backgrounds, continue to struggle with dropout rates and limited educational opportunities.
2. Healthcare Disparities:
Rahil emphasized the need for gender-neutral healthcare policies to address the specific health needs of boys. While initiatives like the Pradhan Mantri Surakshit Matritva Abhiyan focus on maternal health, there’s a lack of similar programs targeting the well-being of boys. Rahil argued that neglecting boys’ health issues perpetuates inequalities and hampers overall societal development.
3. Legal Protections:
While laws like the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act aim to safeguard women’s rights, Rahil highlighted the absence of legislation addressing issues such as male domestic abuse and harassment. He underscored the importance of gender-neutral laws to ensure equal protection under the law for all individuals, regardless of gender.
In addition to these societal challenges, Rahil pointed out that boys also face pressures and expectations that are often overlooked. He argued that societal norms dictate traditional roles and behaviors for boys, limiting their freedom of expression and emotional well-being.
Despite Rahil’s compelling arguments, the fundamental question remains: why hasn’t there been a concerted effort to enact legislation specifically for boys? In a society striving for gender equality, it’s essential to recognize the importance of inclusive policies that address the needs of all genders.
As we contemplate this issue, let us heed the words of Dr. B.R. Ambedkar: “सत्यमेव जयते” (Truth alone triumphs). It’s time for our lawmakers and policymakers to acknowledge the importance of inclusive legislation and work towards a more equitable future for all. Only then can we truly achieve the ideals of independence and justice envisioned by our founding fathers.
This Article was written by a student as part of the Youth Ambassador Program. The views expressed are the author's own.